samedi 17 octobre 2009

A call for unity, not segregation

A call for unity, not segregation

Without blacks’ sacrifice, Latinos would be 30 years behind in the fight for civil rights.


By Hector Tobar
June 16, 2009


http://articles.latimes.com/2009/jun/16/local/me-tobar16



Earlier this year, I attended one of those sedate conferences writers get invited to every so often. I talked for an hour or so very politely about books, until the audience rose up in rebellion and told me to stop.


I’d been invited by USC to be on a panel discussing the topic of blacks and Latinos in Los Angeles literature. But the mostly student audience didn’t want a writerly chat. They wanted to talk about the reality of a divided, angry city.


“There’s certain parts of Watts and Compton where blacks can’t go,” a young black man told us, rising up from his seat to describe Latino gang members’ slurs and threats.


A high school teacher rose to his feet, too, to talk about his Latino students’ ignorance of African American history and the intolerance he often hears from the Spanish-speaking immigrants around him.


It hurts me deeply to hear of these things. I suppose, like a lot of people, I’ve been in a sort of denial about what’s happening in my hometown.


Earlier this month, a few idiots with spray paint, and hate in their hearts, ran an African American family out of a predominantly Latino neighborhood in Duarte. It was the latest in a series of incidents in which suspected Latino gang members have committed crimes against black people.


These acts of intolerance are obviously the work of a tiny minority of delinquents. And yet they feed a larger malaise among African Americans. A lot of black people feel they’re being crowded out and disrespected by the growing plurality of Latinos around them.


I know that mostly our two peoples are working, living in peace and even starting families together. And yet the seeds of a deeper intolerance lie all around us, ready to sprout.


More often than we care to admit, our people segregate themselves from blacks in schools and churches.


And how many of us Latinos have been at family gatherings and heard some obnoxious old uncle drop a racist remark? Generally speaking, do we have the courage to stand up and tell the guy to shut up? No. We’re Latinos, and we don’t like to make an “escándalo” if we can avoid it.


Still, it is those who publicly and privately speak ill of African Americans whom I address today, because the “escándalo” can’t be put off any longer.


Listen up, raza. We’re walking in the footsteps of giants. Black people have bled and been beaten in the name of equality, and without their sacrifice, we’d be 30 years behind where we are today.


The long, African American struggle for civil rights has blossomed into an oak tree of justice whose large canopy protects all of us, no matter our color. And these days there are more of us Latinos huddled under its branches, seeking shelter from discrimination, than any other group.


Let’s start with the basic fact of our citizenship. Like thousands of others Angelenos, I am the son of immigrants. I thus owe my citizenship to Dred Scott, a slave who sued for his freedom in 1857, and to people like Frederick Douglass, who took up his cause.


Scott provoked the Supreme Court into one of the most shameful rulings in American history. Scott vs. Sandford declared that no one of African descent could be a U.S. citizen.


After the Civil War, the black struggle to erase Scott vs. Sandford from American jurisprudence led to the passage of the 14th Amendment, which grants citizenship to those born in the United States. But these days, the children of Mexicans and Central Americans are its chief beneficiary.


Scott and Douglass lived a long time ago, it’s true. But they’re not the only people who helped pave the way for us.


If you’re Latino and have had the pleasure of voting for someone with a Spanish surname, if you live in an integrated neighborhood, you have the dead and battered of 1960s Birmingham and Selma, Ala., to thank for it. Their martyrs are our martyrs too, because their sacrifice made the civil and voting rights we now enjoy possible.


Every Latino civil rights leader knows this. It’s why Cesar Chavez treasured the telegram he received from Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968, just a month before King was killed.


“As brothers in the fight for equality, I extend the hand of fellowship and goodwill . . . to you and your members,” King wrote. “Our separate struggles are really one -- a struggle for freedom, for dignity and for humanity.”


There’s history and then there’s present-day reality. There, too, our debts are clear.


Many of the new Latino neighborhoods in Los Angeles and surrounding cities have been established in historically black communities.


There was no organized black resistance to the “browning” of South-Central Los Angeles or Compton. Yes there were isolated crimes against Latino people in those places, but the more common, everyday truth was that African Americans accepted the arrival of strangers into their neighborhoods.


I saw this firsthand in 1992, when I lived in South-Central on assignment, with my Times colleague Charisse Jones to profile a community in transition from black to brown. We met African Americans who had learned a few words of Spanish and who remembered how whites tried to keep them out of the neighborhood in the 1950s.


“I was once in the same boat they are,” a 70-year-old black resident said of his Latino neighbors. “I don’t mistreat them because I didn’t want to be mistreated.”


I benefited from African American hospitality even before I was born. Which brings me to what may be the real reason I’ve written this column.


If anyone out there knows a black man named Booker Wade who lived in Hollywood in the early 1960s, let me know. He was a neighbor of my mother and father, newly arrived Guatemalan immigrants.


They spoke a language he didn’t understand, but when my mother went into labor, he drove her to the hospital. I’ve never met Mr Wade, who was my godfather. But I owe him about a thousand thank-yous.


And maybe in a way all of us in Latino L.A. have black godparents we need to make the effort to acknowledge.


hector.tobar@latimes.com

samedi 27 juin 2009

Greenpeace Opposes Waxman-Markey ...

Greenpeace Opposes Waxman-Markey
Climate Bill not Science-Based; Benefits Polluters
June 25, 2009
WASHINGTON, D.C., United States — In advance of tomorrow’s vote on the American Clean Energy and Security Act in the House of Representatives, Greenpeace USA Deputy Campaigns Director Carroll Muffett issued the following statement:"Since the Waxman-Markey bill left the Energy and Commerce committee, yet another fleet of industry lobbysists has weakened the bill even more, and further widened the gap between what Waxman-Markey does and what science demands. As a result, Greenpeace opposes this bill in its current form. We are calling upon Congress to vote against this bill unless substantial measures are taken to strengthen it. Despite President Obama’s assurance that he would enact strong, science-based legislation, we are now watching him put his full support behind a bill that chooses politics over science, elevates industry interests over national interest, and shows the significant limitations of what this Congress believes is possible.
“As it comes to the floor, the Waxman-Markey bill sets emission reduction targets far lower than science demands, then undermines even those targets with massive offsets. The giveaways and preferences in the bill will actually spur a new generation of nuclear and coal-fired power plants to the detriment of real energy solutions. To support such a bill is to abandon the real leadership that is called for at this pivotal moment in history.  We simply no longer have the time for legislation this weak.  
“With many others in the environmental, faith and consumer rights communities, Greenpeace has expressed tremendous concern about the role of offsets in this legislation.  Unless strictly controlled, the abuse of offsets could prevent real emission reductions for more than a decade.  The decision to move authority over offsets from EPA to the Department of Agriculture further reduces the likelihood that such controls will be maintained and increases the likelihood they will undermine real reductions.
This legislation sends a strong and unmistakable signal to the world that the United States is not yet ready to show the leadership necessary to reach a strong agreement at Copenhagen in December.  Already, we are seeing the impact of this signal as one country after another retreats from the aggressive targets needed to avoid catastrophic climate change.
We call on the Congress to reject this bill and begin immediate and urgent work on legislation that treats seriously the dire threat of climate change.  We call on President Obama to move beyond rhetoric and deliver on his commitments to “restore science to its proper place” and to lead the world in addressing climate change.
#####
Contact: Molly Dorozenski, 917-864-3724, mdorozen@greenpeace.org
Daniel Kessler, Media Officer, 510-501-1779, dkessler@greenpeace.org
Carroll Muffett, Deputy Campaigns Director, cmuffett@greenpeace.org

lundi 18 mai 2009

Springtime back home in France

Iris du Suchet

Fleur aux cochons dans les bois du Bost

Seringa épargné par Atila

Bouton d'or au Bost

Roses devant la vieille cuisine au Bost

samedi 2 mai 2009

Climate Change Alaska "Swept Away"

http://ej.msu.edu/media/NJClimateChange.pdf

42 N a t i o n a l J o u r n a l 9/13/08

Climate change

Alaska is the “tip of the spear” on global warming, and some of its native villages are literally disappearing.

UPHEAVAL: The Inupiat Eskimo community of Kivalina, located north of the Arctic Circle, displays whale bones from a previous year’s hunt, while children play in the school gymnasium. Tribal leaders are at odds with federal officials over where to move the community, which is being displaced by worsening erosion. photos by margaret kriz 44 N a t i o n a l J o u r n a l 9/13/08

Swept Away

■■By Margaret Kriz

KIVALINA, Alaska—Janet Heh, administrator of this small Inupiat Eskimo village, maneuvers her red all-terrain vehicle down a gravel road and stops a few yards from the shore. Brushing aside a cloud of pesky mosquitoes, she points down the beach to where workers are using heavy construction equipment to move boulders into place for a new seawall. Residents are crossing their fingers that the rock barrier will protect Kivalina from another round of fierce fall storms “Maybe this one will work,” Heh says.

9/13/08 N a t i o n a l J o u r n a l 43

Every autumn since 2004, Kivalina has been punished by storms that have washed away protective beaches and eroded the ground under some homes on the 8-mile-long barrier island. In 2006, state and local officials constructed an experimental seawall of plastic and metal baskets filled with sand. When a mild storm struck, the embankment failed.

Last September, many of Kivalina’s 380 citizens were evacuated when a large squall approached the island in northwest Alaska. Leaders feared that high waves would overturn the community’s oil-storage tanks and cause toxic chemicals to spill into the village and the nearby waters. Although the storm dissipated, the threat motivated local officials to move the tanks to higher ground on the southern end of the island. Meanwhile, the state Legislature coughed up $3 million to begin building the rock barrier, which the Army Corps of Engineers says should last for 15 years.

But the wall is just a temporary solution. Over the next 15 years, Kivalina’s residents will have to move from the island, a relocation that the Corps estimates will cost $150 million to $250 million.

Lying 80 miles north of the Arctic Circle, Kivalina is one of six native villages that Alaska officials say are at critical risk from the effects of increasingly intense storms, melting permafrost, and accelerating erosion caused by climate change. Another 184 of Alaska’s native villages also face serious problems tied to rising temperatures, according to a 2004 study by the Government Accountability Office. “We in Alaska are firsthand global-warming witnesses,” says Deborah Williams, president of Alaska Conservation Solutions, a group that focuses on climate-change issues.

Today, the annual average temperature in Alaska is 4 degrees Fahrenheit higher than it was 50 years ago—a larger increase than in other parts of the nation, according to the U.S. Global Change Research Program. During that time, the state’s growing season has lengthened by more than 14 days, according to the group. Some scientists predict that Alaska’s average temperatures could jump by an additional 5 to 18 degrees by 2100.

Such a dramatic shift would radically alter the state’s landscape, where 80 percent of the subsoil is icy permafrost. “Here, if you have a degree or 2 of warming, you can have large structural changes,” says Larry Hinzman, director of the International Arctic Research Center at the University of Alaska (Fairbanks). “It’s not just that the permafrost could thaw, but also glaciers would melt.

Warmer temperatures would increase the cost of building and maintaining roads, water and sewer systems, schools, and other public buildings by 10 to 20 percent, according to a 2007 report by the University of Alaska (Anchorage). Melting permafrost could cause roads and foundations to buckle, and in some areas the infrastructure could become more vulnerable to flooding or fire. More than twice the size of Texas, Alaska is surrounded on three sides by water. The state’s 33,000-mile coast, which accounts for more than half of the entire U.S. coastline, is especially vulnerable to rising sea levels triggered by climate change.

The escalating crisis has Alaska’s politicians scrambling. Last year state officials, many of whom had earlier denied that the climate was warming, began taking a closer look. Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, now the Republican vice presidential nominee, set up a Climate Change Subcabinet Group to address the immediate problems facing the native villages. The panel will also consider how Alaska, which depends heavily on royalties from the oil industry, can curb its greenhouse-gas emissions.

Alaska’s congressional delegation is pushing for federal funding to help state residents adjust. During debate on climate change legislation this summer, Alaska’s senators persuaded Democratic leaders to include $50 billion for adaptation programs in the state. The package later died on the Senate floor, but action on global warming is expected to be a top priority in the next Congress.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, says that her state is the “tip of the spear” on climate change in the United States. “Clearly, climate change is there; it’s real,” she said in an interview. “We can see it happening in Alaska more so than in other parts of the country.” Murkowski is in line to become the ranking Republican on the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee in the 111th Congress, putting her in a key position to influence the legislative debate on climate change.

Of course, Alaska would gain even more clout if Republican presidential nominee John McCain wins in November, elevating Palin to the national stage and into the White House.

HEATING UP: Climate change is thawing the permafrost subsoil underlying 80 percent of Alaska. Along the oil pipeline, which runs the length of the state, engineers have installed brush-like equipment that releases ground heat. Scientists warn that ice imbedded in the permafrost could melt (below).

Digging Deep Into the Permafrost

FOX, Alaska—Ten miles north of Fairbanks, at the edge of what was once gold-rush territory, the Army Corps of Engineers operates a research facility dug into a hill of permafrost. Constructed in the 1960s to study mining and road-building techniques, the tunnel now gives scientists a rare and important view of the underside of Alaska’s frozen subsoil.

At the surface, Alaska geology consists of a layer of soil that freezes and thaws with the seasons. But in 80 percent of the state, the next layer of subsoil is permafrost that has stayed relatively stable— and frozen—since the last Ice Age, 30,000 years ago. Inside the tunnel, scientists can examine the components of the permafrost, from the hardened silt and stone to the massive ribbons of frozen streams and ice wedges that formed as the Earth expanded and contracted.

Understanding the terrain’s hidden strengths and weaknesses was important to the engineers who built the Alaskan oil pipeline, which cuts through the center of the state. They came to the tunnel to test the endurance of the frozen soils. NASA researchers used the tunnel to test soil-sampling techniques for the space agency’s mission to Mars.

Now climate-change scientists are coming to study how Alaska’s warming temperatures are affecting ground conditions.

In recent decades, warmer surface temperatures have triggered changes in the permafrost. At sites near the tunnel, the ground temperatures have increased by at least 1 degree Celsius, according to site coordinator Charles Collins, a physical scientist with the Corps’s Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory. Climate scientists say that if the warming trend continues throughout the state, the surface of some parts of Alaska could begin to sink.

“If the ice in the permafrost melts, then you can have large amounts of surface subsidence” or collapse, explained Larry Hinzman, director of the International Arctic Research Center at the University of Alaska (Fairbanks). “The problem is, a lot of our structures in Fairbanks were built in the ’70s and early ’80s based on soil temperatures during the previous 30 years.” Now the soils are warming, and buildings, roads, and runways are likely to be affected. Engineers have developed technologies to help keep the ground frozen. Along the oil pipeline, for example, they have installed brush-like devices called thermosyphons to pull the heat from the ground and release it into the air. “There are engineering fixes that can keep the ground frozen and keep pipelines and buildings safe,” Hinzman said. Such technology is expensive, however. The state’s permafrost layer, which varies in depth depending on the average local temperature, isn’t going to disappear any time soon, Collins said. But some areas are already feeling the effects of permafrost thaw. In the Tanana Flats south of Fairbanks, the ground under the birch forest has partially melted, causing trees to tilt and collapse. Climate scientists also worry that thawing permafrost will release high levels of carbon dioxide from dead plants that have been trapped in the frozen ground for centuries. —M.K.

Alarming Changes

The Alaskans who live in the native villages have been among the first to feel the effects of global warming—a phenomena that some of them call a “fever on the earth.” The tribal communities, some of which can be traced back 10,000 years, have survived by vigilantly watching the natural world, noted Patricia Cochran, an Inupiat Indian who is executive director of the Alaska Native Science Commission.

Over the past several decades, the climate has been changing with unprecedented speed, she said. “Our abilities to read the weather, as we have been able to do for a long period of time, are just not the same,” Cochran said, “because the conditions are changing so rapidly. We’re literally losing people to extreme weather events that are not easily predictable anymore.”

In Kivalina, which was long protected by the accumulated ice that weakened the fall winds, the coast has been battered, said Enoch Adams Jr., who grew up on the island and heads the village’s relocation planning committee. Historically snow would collect on the ocean surface and form slush in September, explained Adams, who also represents Kivalina on the Northwest Arctic Borough council. “The winds and the waves would push the slush to the shore and form shore-fast ice,” he said. “That would create a barrier of sorts on our beach.

In recent decades, however, warmer temperatures have lingered into September. The benevolent snows have been replaced by rain, and the fall storms intensify as they travel over open seas, whipping up waves that hammer the islands. “We talk to elders, and they tell us that they know erosion has been going on, but they’ve never seen it happen this fast before,” Adams said.

Kivalina residents report other alarming changes. Last summer village elder Joe Swan discovered that the ground around his ice cellar, a traditional meat freezer dug into the permafrost, had thawed. The hole filled with water, spoiling the caribou and seal meat he had stored there months earlier.

Along Kivalina’s shore, the level of the Chukchi Sea is rising. The island has been pelted with rain in the middle of winter—a time when temperatures historically dropped to 40 degrees below zero. In January 2007, winds unexpectedly blew the shore ice away, which tribal elders said was unprecedented. Large sinkholes have developed along the shore of the Wulik River, the source of Kivalina’s drinking water. (The community has no municipal water or sewer system; residents rely on water hauled from the river and on bucket toilets.)

The rising temperatures are shortening the region’s hunting seasons. Bearded seals, which the natives call ugruk, are now accessible for only a couple of weeks each spring, rather than for a month or more. This year the ice vanished so quickly that Kivalina’s hunters never got the chance to harvest walrus. That’s worrisome for families, some of whom depend on hunting for 95 percent of their food, Adams said.

And then there is the thriving mosquito population, which used to peak in July but now hangs on well into the fall. “August was not supposed to be the month of mosquitoes,” said the 73-year-old Swan. “They were supposed to fade away.” In late August, Swan said, a group of Kivalina residents went to the mainland tundra to begin berry picking but were forced to run away from the mosquitoes. “It didn’t used to be that way at berry-picking time,” he said.

Good News, Bad News

A year ago, the Arctic sea ice at the North Pole, which melts during the summer months into September and then refreezes in the winter, diminished to its lowest level in recorded history, a phenomena that many scientists attribute to climate change.

At about the same time, dozens of German tourists unexpectedly showed up at the whale exhibition in the Inupiat village of Barrow, the northernmost city in the United States. Barrow is not connected to the rest of the state by roads, so visitors usually arrive by plane. But the Germans traveled to Alaska by boat through the ice-free Northwest Passage along Canada’s northern coast. Barrow’s town leaders and the U.S. Coast Guard admit that they weren’t prepared for the onslaught of tourists. “It was a total surprise to everyone,” said David Harding, a spokesman for Barrow.

This year, with the Arctic ice once again melting at a record pace, the Germans have promised to come back to Barrow. “This time, U.S. Customs and Immigration officials will be waiting for them,” Harding said. According to the National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder, Colo., the Arctic sea ice this summer melted to its second lowest size on record.

Climate change is a good-news, bad-news story for Alaska, according to a March report by the Legislature’s Joint Alaska Climate Impact Assessment Commission. On the plus side, melting Arctic ice opens the door for development of a commercial shipping industry that could bring more business and jobs to the state. “Access to northern Europe via the northern sea route and to the eastern United States via the Northwest Passage [is] vital to commercial shipping interests,” the report noted.

Industry is already expanding oil and natural-gas development operations in the Arctic region, which could bring additional royalties to Alaska. This fall, the U.S. Geological Survey plans to map the unexplored Arctic Ocean floor to determine where oil, natural-gas, and mining development might take place. In fact, the countries bordering the ocean are in a race to tap its potential mineral resources.

As Alaska’s warm weather lingers into fall, more tourists are likely to cruise the state’s shores, visit Denali National Park and Preserve, fish in the world-class waters, and hunt in the immense wilderness areas. Scientists from across the globe are flocking to Alaska to study the effects of climate change. “Research of all types in Alaska is a $300 million-per-year proposition and a growth sector, in large measure because of climate-change research,” according to the state report.

Some native communities hope that climate change will have a positive side. “You can see a gleam in some whalers’ eyes because they say, maybe this will be good for whaling,” said Glenn Sheehan, executive director of the Barrow Arctic Science Consortium. “They hope that, somehow, warming eventually will wind up creating more food for the whales.” The warmer coastal waters have led salmon populations to migrate into the northern reaches of the state, although southern populations of the fish are suffering.

Many native leaders, scientists, and environmentalists warn, however, that increased ship traffic and oil exploration in the Arctic will inevitably cause oil spills and other pollution problems. “The great fear of people who live on the North Slope is that all this activity inevitably will lead to some kind of oil spill or blowout that can’t be dealt with because of ice,” Sheehan said. The new commercial activity could also infringe on the sea mammal hunting areas that indigenous Alaskans depend on for food. The open seas are already attracting commercial fishing boats that are competing with the subsistence fishermen.

Now scientists worry that the environmentally sensitive caribou may alter their migration path to look for new sources of food. That would be a blow to the 300 residents of Anaktuvuk Pass, who rely on the caribou for food.

Climate change is also changing the face of the boreal forest in the south-central part of the state. Warm, dry weather creates perfect conditions for insect infestation and disease among the birch, white spruce, and black spruce trees that dominate the terrain. Those species have thrived in the region’s historically cold and wet conditions, and they have struggled during recent summers.

In the 1990s, the Kenai Peninsula along Alaska’s southern coast experienced a decade of warm summers and mild winters that triggered a catastrophic outbreak of bark beetles. The pests killed 3 million acres of spruce trees, half of the forestland on the peninsula. The attack ended only after the bugs ran out of mature trees to kill, according to Ed Berg, an ecologist with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. He said that unless the winters get significantly colder—it takes temperatures of 40 degrees below zero or lower to wipe out the beetle population—the insects could hit the trees that were too small in the first go-round but are now maturing.

Salmon are also diminishing in the warmer temperatures on the Kenai Peninsula and are increasingly likely to have fungal infections, Berg said. Across the state, salmon are falling prey to parasite-related infections, bacteria, and other disease-spreading organisms. Some native elders predict that salmon will disappear from much of Alaska in the next 10 years, said Larry Merculieff, an Aleut leader who is deputy director of the Alaska Native Science Commission.

In the coming years, Berg said, Alaska could get some relief from the hot, dry conditions. “Some folks, like some of the scientists at [the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration], say that we’re now trending toward a cooler phase,” he said. “But even if that’s the case, the cool summers will not be as cool as they were 50 years ago.” By all estimates, he said, the average temperature in Alaska is expected to get warmer.

Too Far Gone

In April, Palin’s Immediate Action Workgroup, which is part of Climate Change Subcabinet Group, recommended that the state finally take the lead in helping Alaskans cope with climate change. In previous years, state officials were noticeably absent from the discussions, and the native communities relied on piecemeal help from federal agencies and tribal groups. This summer, the Legislature allocated $14 million to aid six villages in building new erosion-control systems and drawing up relocation plans, and to help other tribal leaders assess how warming temperatures are affecting their villages.

In the gravest situation is Newtok, a small Yupik Eskimo village on the southeastern coast that the Corps of Engineers has determined is too far gone to save. Located at the confluence of the Ninglick and Newtok rivers, the community has already lost its landfill and barge landing site to soil erosion and infilling of the rivers.

Erosion is not a new problem for Newtok. In the late 1950s, native leaders used dog sleds to move the town’s sod houses over winter ice from its disappearing home to its current location. In the last decade, however, conditions deteriorated quickly as warm sea waters thawed the permafrost under the village. This time around, moving Newtok will be more complicated and expensive because of the community’s infrastructure, schools, clinics, and government buildings.

If a major storm were to ravage Newtok this fall, its residents would probably be relocated to Fairbanks, said Michael Black, deputy commissioner of Alaska’s Commerce, Community, and Economic Development Department and the co-chairman of the Immediate Action Workgroup. Such a move could devastate the native culture, Black acknowledged. “You’d be moving Yupik Eskimo coastal village people to the interior of Alaska, which is in the middle of one of the largest non-native communities in the state. That has negative consequences.”

That kind of abrupt relocation would be particularly painful to villages that have endured for centuries. The native people of Shishmaref, for example, have lived on their barrier island on the western coast for at least 4,000 years, said Tony Weyiouanna Sr., who until recently headed the city’s relocation committee.

With their village being washed away by storms, however, the residents of Shishmaref are resigned to moving from their ancestral home. “In 2002, the majority of people voted to relocate,” Weyiouanna said. “But even if we voted yes to relocate, there are probably not very many people that actually want to move. I voted to relocate, but not by choice. I don’t want to move. This is our culture.”

Newtok, Shishmaref, and the other native villages hope to keep their communities and cultures intact by moving en masse, an approach backed by state and federal officials. “We want to help the communities find a place as close as we can to where they are currently if they need to relocate and if they chose to relocate,” Black said. “We’ll offer them some of the means and mechanisms to get to that site, if they choose to.”

That plan could work for Newtok and Shishmaref, whose leaders have agreed on new sites for their communities. Newtok has already built three homes at the new location and hopes to construct a road and a barge landing site to help transfer some of the community’s existing buildings to the site.

Locking Horns

Kivalina, however, is following a more difficult path. Like the people of Newtok, Kivalina’s residents were once nomadic, moving with the seasons to obtain food. The village was established in the early 1900s when the Bureau of Indian Affairs built a school on the island and ordered the native families to bring their children to classes. Now the community has about 80 homes built on short stilts above the permafrost.

Kivalina’s people have been talking about moving for decades, because the town, which is crammed on only 2 square miles of land, has become seriously overcrowded. They also want sewer and water systems, which state officials have said would be too expensive to construct on the barrier island. After years of delay, coastal erosion is forcing village leaders to take action. “Before, moving was just one of the options,” said Colleen Swan, tribal administrator of Kivalina and Joe Swan’s daughter. “Now we don’t have a choice. We have to get off of this island.”

But local leaders are locking horns with federal officials over where the community should go. Residents prefer a site that’s just across the lagoon from their current home and near the river where they have traditionally hunted and fished. Army Corps officials say that site is in a floodplain and would eventually succumb to erosion and flooding.

Federal experts have proposed two other sites several miles north of Kivalina, on higher and rockier ground at the edge of the tundra. Kivalina residents object that those locations are too windy, a factor that could hike their heating costs. More important to the village residents, the proposed sites are too far from hunting. “We need to have access to the ocean for seal hunting, whale hunting,” Joe Swan noted. “We need to stay close to the river. That’s why Kivalina was settled here.”

Efforts to negotiate a solution have been hampered by a lack of money and by the involvement of multiple agencies that generate layers of red tape. “There really isn’t any agency that has responsibility for addressing climate change,” Colleen Swan said. The state’s entrance to the debate has further muddied the process, contended Kivalina relocation chief Adams. “It’s good that the state is finally getting involved,” he said. “But we’re rehashing the same things over and over again.”

Black said that state officials are not going to force Kivalina or any other community to move to a new location. “We’re not going to pick up an entire community and move it to that site,” he said. “My own personal feeling is that when any agency takes the approach that they’re going to force an entire community to move, then it’s really not much different than moving the Cherokee to Oklahoma. And I think that’s not what the government wants to do—forced relocation.”

But Alaskan officials are beginning to recognize the magnitude of the job ahead. This year’s $14 million allocation for immediate work on the six communities is “just the beginning, and that concerns a number of people,” Black said. With each community move expected to cost upwards of $100 million, he said, “exactly how much of an obligation is the state of Alaska going to assume?”

Things to Come

Last fall, as Arctic sea ice melted at an unprecedented pace, thousands of walruses moved off the dwindling ice floes and took up residence on Alaska’s northern coast near Wainwright. “It was the first time in written or oral history that the people of Wainwright saw this,” noted F. Stuart (Terry) Chapin, an ecology professor at the Institute of Arctic Biology at the University of Alaska (Fairbanks). Chapin reasoned that the walruses, which are bottomfeeders, probably came ashore because the ice that they usually use as a home base drifted into waters that were too deep for feeding.

“My understanding was that the community was incredibly restrained— there was no mass harvest of walruses,” Chapin said. “But the community is very, very concerned. Climate change is wreaking havoc on the way they’ve traditionally used and interacted with the land and sea.”

Scientists are increasingly working with the native communities to gather information about on-the-ground changes in Alaska and to gain a historical perspective on environmental conditions, Chapin said. “These are areas where, from a Western science point of view, we have relatively sparse data,” he said. “So we find ourselves going more and more to local and indigenous observations.”

While the scientists work to understand the natural changes caused by the warming climate, native communities and government officials are looking for ways to adapt. In Shishmaref, village leaders decided to raise public awareness and attract government money for their efforts by taking their story to the international media. “Shishmaref is a subsistence-based community, and we have no resources,” Weyiouanna said. “So I decided to try to use the media as a tool.”

But the traditionally isolated community has paid a heavy toll for moving into the spotlight. After years of coordinating press visits, Weyiouanna has resigned as Shishmaref relocation director. “He and so many others in the community have given up everything to not only lobby for a little understanding but also to explain their story to outsiders,” Murkowski said. “Understandably, the natives are tired of it.”

Kivalina, which has also become a stop on the international global-warming media tour, took other action to gain public attention. In February, the city and tribe sued ExxonMobil and 23 other energy companies for damages related to climate change. Based on the class-action suits filed against the tobacco industry, the Kivalina lawsuit charged that the companies are major contributors to climate change that is threatening to destroy the coastal community. The energy companies are seeking to have the charges dismissed.

In Washington, Murkowski is pushing Congress to allow oil and natural-gas development in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, and to dedicate some of the royalties to adaptation programs and to help communities install wind, geothermal, and other clean-energy projects. “We’ve got a bank that’s sitting up there right now,” she said. “ANWR is nothing but a big fat ol’ energy bank. Let’s use those resource dollars to make alternative energy work here.”

Palin’s sub-Cabinet panel, meanwhile, is developing a set of recommendations to help Alaskans adapt. Chapin, who is a member of the panel’s Adaptation Advisory Group, noted that the state is sailing in uncharted waters. “There are a couple of states that have set up adaptation task forces, but they’re at the organizational stage,” he said. “The governor has tasked us with coming up with policy recommendations within the next year. We’re on a fast track.”

The first line of defense on climate change is the native communities, Chapin said. “Rural Alaska is probably further along than anybody else at recognizing the importance of these issues and beginning to think about adaptation options.”

In Kivalina, Joe Swan noted that the swarming mosquitoes in August was a sign that sea ice will not be forming in September. Government weather experts predict that the island community will be hit with rain, not snow, well into the autumn. It’s another year to watch for fall storms.

“Alaska is stuck with at least 50 years of climate warming, regardless of what policies are put in place,” Chapin said. “We’re already having really tough problems, and it’s going to get a lot worse. We’re stuck because of the inaction that we collectively are responsible for over the last half-century.”

Native leaders say that Alaska’s climate-change problems are a warning to the rest of the nation. “You think the lower 48 [states] or any part of the world is going to be isolated from this stuff?” Aleut leader Merculieff asked. “No way, because everything is connected.”

This story was partially researched through a fellowship with Michigan State University’s Knight Center for Environmental Journalism. The author can be reached at mkriz@nationaljournal.com. Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin set up a Climate Change Subcabinet Group to address the problems facing native villages. ■■Seeking Solutions AP/Chris Miller

Native hunters confirm that climate change has altered ice conditions. Sea ice is not as thick as it used to be, and it doesn’t extend as far from shore—thus making it harder to catch seals, walruses, and whales. According to the Global Change Research Program, sea ice off of Alaska’s shores has retreated by 14 percent since 1978 and thinned by 40 percent since the 1960s. “Imagine trying to pull a 50-ton whale up on an ice ledge and the ledge is melting out from under you,” Sheehan explained. “It doesn’t work very well.” Evidence that Alaska is America’s front line on climate change extends beyond the coastal communities. Last summer, north central Alaska was hit by the state’s largest-ever tundra fire. A lightning strike burned 250,000 acres of abnormally dry land outside of the small native village of Anaktuvuk Pass, wiping out the lichen plants that the caribou eat as they migrate north.

samedi 25 avril 2009

Physique quantique

http://www.geocities.com/crousset.geo/quantiq.html.
13 mars 2005.

14921-2009-04-25-13-28.jpg

Physique quantique

La physique quantique, voila un domaine qui échappe au sens commun. Elle est intimement liée avec le monde qui nous entoure dans la mesure ou elle permet de décrire les propriétés dynamiques des particules subatomiques et les interactions entre la matière et le rayonnement.  Cependant, la théorie quantique reste en marge (jusqu'a présent...) avec les théories qui s'appliquent à l'échelle macroscopique (la mécanique classique par exemple).


Qui veut appréhender la physique quantique doit abandonner toute intuition  et toute logique fondée sur sa connaissance du monde qui nous entoure. De plus, elle s'appuie sur des formalismes mathématiques puissants impossibles à traduire en concepts courants. La théorie quantique se caractérise par un ensemble de concepts abstraits totalement contre-intuitifs qui la rende très difficile à vulgariser. Ce pourquoi cette page ne s'étalera pas dans les détails saugrenus de cette discipline mais essaiera plutôt d'aborder les notions, précisément non intuitives, qu'il est nécessaire d'avoir à l'esprit pour mieux appréhender les sujets de ce site.


Aujourd'hui, la théorie quantique constitue le fondement de toute la physique moderne: la physique du solide, la physique de la matière condensée, la supraconductivité, la physique nucléaire et la physique des particules élémentaires trouvent en cette théorie un base cohérente.



Ce que ne sont pas les atomes

En 1911, le physicien Rutherford détermina l'existence du noyau atomique. Il émit l'hypothèse que tous les atomes sont constitués d'un noyau dense chargé positivement et autour duquel tournent, comme les planètes autour du Soleil, les électrons chargés négativement. La théorie électromagnétique classique développée par le physicien britannique James Maxwell prédit sans équivoque qu'un électron tournant autour du noyau rayonne continuellement de l'énergie électromagnétique jusqu'à épuisement total de son énergie. Ainsi, d'après la théorie classique, un atome tel que décrit par Rutherford serait instable. Cette lacune amena le physicien danois Niels Bohr, à postuler, en 1913, que la théorie classique n'est pas valable pour un atome et que les électrons se déplacent sur des orbites placées à des distances déterminées du noyau et qu'à chaque changement d'orbite d'un électron il y a absorption (s'il s'éloigne du noyau) ou émission d'énergie (s'il s'en approche). Damned, qu'avait il fait la, l'image décrite en 1911 est sympathique car facile à assimiler avec des concepts familiers. Cependant, comme je l'ai souligné plus haut, la mécanique quantique n'est pas le domaine du familier, l'image donnée par Bohr est pour le moins trompeuse. Les électrons ne tournent pas autour du noyau! Ce sont des objets quantiques qui ne sont pas modélisations par des points et qui ne possèdent pas de trajectoire. Les électrons n'occupent pas une position précise mais sont diffus. On les décrit par une fonction d'onde qui détermine la probabilité de leur présence en un lieu et à un instant donné. On représente communément cette probabilité par des sortes de nuages flou (orbitales) plus ou moins dense selon cette probabilité. Les électrons d'un atome on des niveaux d'énergie bien définis spécifique à l'élément considéré.



Théorie des quanta

Le premier développement qui conduisit à la résolution des difficultés théoriques que les observations amenaient fut l'introduction par le physicien allemand Max Planck de la notion de quantum comme réponse aux études conduites par les physiciens sur le rayonnement du corps noir, pendant les dernières années du XIXe siècle. Son hypothèse indiquait que l'énergie était rayonnée seulement par quanta d'énergie h.f, où f est la fréquence et h le quantum d'action, connu aujourd'hui sous le nom de constante de Planck. En 1900, Planck affirma donc que la matière ainsi que l'énergie rayonnante ont une structure discontinue et postula que la matière ne peut émettre ou absorber l'énergie rayonnante que par petites unités discrètes appelées quanta.



 

La superposition d'état

Voila encore une exclusivité quantique. Le principe de superposition affirme que les caractéristiques d'un atome, d'une particule ou d'un système quantique en général constituant un état. Or, quand un système à plusieurs état possibles, la somme de tous ces états est également un état possible! Le système se trouve alors dans une superposition d'état. C'et grâce à ce principe qu'une particule peut occuper plusieurs positions à la fois ou qu'un atome peut se trouver dans un état de superposition d'energies. Ce phénomène est bien sur impensable dans l'univers classique. Le simple fait de mesurer fait disparaître la superposition d'état au profit d'un seul. Pourtant à défaut d'avoir une mesure de la superposition d'états la théorie quantique nous donne la probabilité qu'on a de mesurer chaque état.


Remarque: Pour rester dans le domaine de la cosmologie, on peut souligner une hypothèse intéressante de Hugh Everest qui postule que a chaque réduction du nombre d'états il n'y a pas passage de superposition d'états à un seul mais réalisation de tous les état dans un univers différent. Théorie qui reste, à priori, invérifiable de par le fait que les univers parallèles ne communiquent pas entre eux.


La dualité onde-corpuscule

Que les atomes soient constitués de particules, soit, mais il restait encore des phénomènes inexplicables. Comme les ondes électromagnétiques ont des caractéristiques de particules, le physicien français Louis Victor de Broglie suggère, en 1924, que la dualité s'appliquait non seulement à la lumière mais aussi à la matière et qu'ainsi les particules pourraient aussi montrer des propriétés d'ondes. Quelques années plus tard, cette prédiction fut vérifiée expérimentalement par les physiciens américains Clinton Joseph Davisson, Lester Halbert Germer et le britannique George Paget Thomson. Ils montrèrent qu'un faisceau d'électrons dispersés par un cristal génère une diffraction caractéristique d'une onde. 


Comment ce concept peut il s'accorder avec les observations de tous les jours où la matière est solide et fiable ? On peut penser que comme la valeur énorme de la constante c nous cache les véritables propriétés de l'espace-temps, la petitesse de la constante de Planck h, nous occulte le caractère ondulatoire de la matière en les rendant négligeable au niveau macroscopique. 



L'équation d'onde

La notion ondulatoire de la particule permet au physicien australien [autrichien !] Erwin Schrödinger de développer une équation dite équation d'onde pour décrire les propriétés ondulatoires de la particule et, plus particulièrement, le comportement de l'électron dans l'atome d'hydrogène. L'équation d'onde de Schrödinger présente donc quelques solutions discrètes seulement, ces solutions sont des expressions mathématiques dont les paramètres représentent les nombres quantiques. (Les nombres quantiques sont des entiers introduits dans la physique des particules pour exprimer la grandeur de certaines quantités caractéristiques des particules ou des systèmes.) Les solutions de l'équation de Schrödinger indiquent aussi que les quatre nombres quantiques de deux électrons ne peuvent pas occuper le même état énergétique. Cette règle, déjà établie empiriquement par le physicien suisse Wolfgang Pauli, en 1925, est appelée principe d'exclusion.


Le principe d'incertitude

L'impossibilité de localiser un électron avec exactitude à un moment précis est analysée par Werner Heisenberg qui, en 1927, formule le principe d'incertitude. Ce principe stipule l'impossibilité de déterminer simultanément la position exacte et le moment d'une particule. Non pas à cause de l'imprécision des appareils de mesure, mais à cause d'une caractéristique intrinsèque du monde quantique. En premier lieu, il est impossible de mesurer la position d'une particule sans perturber sa vitesse. Les connaissances de la position et de la vitesse sont dites complémentaires, c'est-à-dire qu'elles ne peuvent pas être précisées simultanément. Ce principe est aussi fondamental si l'on veut comprendre la mécanique quantique telle qu'elle est conçue aujourd'hui: les caractères ondulatoire et corpusculaire du rayonnement électromagnétique peuvent être compris comme deux propriétés complémentaires du rayonnement.



Le principe d'incertitude est à la base d'un effet curieux appelé “Effet Tunnel“. Si une balle est lancé contre un mur, celle ci rebondit faute d'avoir assez d'énergie pour traverser le mur. Au niveau microscopique, la mécanique quantique affirme qu'il y a une probabilité non nulle pour qu'une particule se retrouve de l'autre coté du mur. Le principe d'Heisenberg autorise les particules à emprunter de l'énergie à condition de la restituer dans les délais temporels imposés par les relations d'incertitudes. Ainsi, face à un mur de béton, les particules peuvent (et le font parfois!) emprunter suffisamment d'énergie pour creuser un tunnel à travers le mur. Ce phénomène est bien sur très improbable au niveau macroscopique puisqu'il faut que toute les particules d'un objet aient la chance de pouvoir traverser au même moment! La petitesse de la constante h montre qu'il faudrait attendre au moins l'age de l'univers estimée avant d'avoir une chance de réussir.



En vertu de ces principes, l'Univers obéit à un modèle mathématique précis et rigoureux qui ne peut que déterminer la probabilité d'occurrence d'un futur possible. Ce futur n'est donc pas forcement celui qui se réalise...



Les recherches actuelles

Malgré son efficacité incontestable et ses succès dans de nombreux domaines et applications de la physique (lasers, transistors, ...) la physique quantique continue à poser deux problèmes d'envergure :


        •          Où se trouve la limite entre ce monde quantique aux règles étranges et le monde macroscopique que la physique classique décrit entièrement?


        •         Pourquoi les lois des la physiques quantique, qui ne s'appliquent qu'au monde subatomique, ne peuvent se généraliser à l'échelle de l'univers (ou inversement).


Nous sommes confronté à deux constatations contradictoires. Le monde quantique semble exister en marge de l'univers et pourtant on a pu constater que l'observateur perturbe l'objet quantique quand il l'observe, le monde extérieur ne semble donc pas exister de façon totalement indépendante! La recherche du lien entre la mécanique quantique et les lois de l'univers (la théorie du tout en quelque sorte) est toujours un des plus grand défi de la physique.



http://www.geocities.com/crousset.geo/index.html
http://www.geocities.com/crousset.geo/cosmos.html
mailto:cedric.rousset@free.fr
http://www.geocities.com/crousset.geo/biblio_cosmo.html
 
 

Gatsby Green breast

http://www.generationterrorists.com/quotes/the_great_gatsby.html

Most of the big shore places were closed now and there were hardly any lights except the shadowy, moving glow of a ferryboat across the Sound. And as the moon rose higher the inessential houses began to melt away until gradually I became aware of the old island here that flowered once for Dutch sailors' eyes - a fresh, green breast of the new world. Its vanished trees, the trees that had made way for Gatsby's house, had once pandered in whispers to the last and greatest of all human dreams; for a transitory enchanted moment man must have held his breath in the presence of this continent, compelled into an aesthetic contemplation he neither understood nor desired, face to face for the last time in history with something commensurate to his capacity for wonder.

samedi 18 avril 2009

Madagascar article étudiants Michigan

http://www.ejmagazine.com/2008b/30.Madagascar.html

Madagascar at a Crossroads

Between development and conservation, an island's unparalleled biodiversity persists


STORY AND PHOTOS BY ANISA ABID


Abid studied wildlife in Madagascar in the Summer of 2008 as part of a Michigan State University study abroad program.







30.Madagascar-2009-04-18-21-39.jpg
Brookesia chameleons are some of the smallest reptiles on Earth. They live mostly in the dry deciduous forests of Madagascar.


Walking through the rainforest in Madagascar’s Andasibe-Mantadia National Park, the haunting call of the Indri, the largest living lemur, can be heard from more than a mile away. Its eerie call in a misty rainforest, where moss drapes off the canopy and earthen smells fill the air, sets the tone for the challenges this species faces. With about three adults per square mile in one of the park’s restricted forest fragments, they are one of the many lemur species threatened with extinction.
They’re not the only endangered animals on the island.
Since man arrived 1,500 years ago, deforestation has accounted for a 90 percent loss of natural trees, according to the World Wildlife Fund. And many rare plant and animal species — like the elephant bird and pygmy hippopotamus — have gone extinct.
There are 355 species of animals — 99 of which are fish or mollusks — and 281 plants listed as endangered by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. Madagascar primatologist Jonah Ratsimbazafy said a growing population is straining the country’s remaining natural resources.
“We have a saying: All cows cannot awake at the same time,” Ratsimbazafy said. “There are some people who are aware of the problem. Some people, maybe tomorrow.”
He works with the Durrell Wildife Conservation Trust to educate and organize the local community to protect the forests.
Those communities are rewarded through Durrell’s management-transfer programs, which include building schools or infrastructure in exchange for conserving nature.
“If man is part of the problem, he should be part of the solution,” Ratsimbazafy said.
An Island Apart 
When Madagascar broke away from Africa about 60 million years ago, its isolation resulted in an extremely high level of endemic species, those found nowhere else. Scientists believe creatures slowly inhabited the island by floating on vegetation rafts across the Mozambique Channel.
They evolved quickly to fit unique niches.
Lemur species as small as mice feed at night on insects. Others are much larger and eat leaves during the day. They can spring from tree to tree — some can leap as far as 33 feet and land on a spike-covered tree trunk without pricking themselves. They are found in various habitats, from mountain forests to wetlands — the Alaotran gentle lemur is the world’s only primate that lives exclusively in wetlands. Lemurs have adapted to feed on particular parts of plants, so they rarely compete for food.
Though Africa hosts a larger number of species in general, Madagascar holds more endemic — strictly native — species — on an area about the size of France. The island features seven of the eight existing baobab trees, compared to only one in all of Africa. Of the 101 native animal species recorded on the island, nearly all are endemic. Conservation International considers Madagascar one of, if not the most significant biodiversity “hotspots.” An Australian study named it among the top six of the world’s 18 countries having exceptional biodiversity.
Vanishing Act 
Most of Madagascar’s unusual animals and plants have decreased since man arrived 15 centuries ago and began fishing and cattle ranching. Since then, one-fifth of all known lemur species and a third of known genera of lemur have gone extinct.
As much as is known about the country’s biodiversity, there may still be more unknown.
New species are continually discovered. An upcoming report from the International Journal of Primatology states 39 species of lemur have been discovered since 2000, including 11 new species of mouse lemurs.
Habitat loss from deforestation, which extends to multiple classes of wildlife, is the underlying threat for these endangered animals.
Lemurs face additional pressure from hunters who stalk them for food or cultural beliefs. The endangered aye-aye, for example, looks more like a bat with its dark fur, orange eyes, large ears, and long, curved, claw-like nails. Yet it is a harmless nocturnal lemur that is routinely killed by some superstitious locals who consider it to be a portent of evil, according to Kyoto University’s Zoology Department.
The exotic pet trade, a multi-billion dollar industry, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, has left several turtle species critically endangered. Ploughshare Tortoises are extremely rare — only about 600 remain in the wild, according to Durrell.
The majestic Madagascar fish-eagle faces extinction. The bird of prey once lived along 1,300 miles of western coastline.
But deforestation and encroaching development has shrunk its habitat to less than 30 percent of that — a scant 370 miles, according to Durrell. Only about 230 critically endangered pairs remain, according to The Peregrine Fund’s latest estimate.
At about 2.5 feet long with a 6.5-foot wingspan, they are the largest species of eagles or hawks in Madagascar.
In Madagascar’s rivers and surrounding ocean, endemic fish populations are fast becoming exhausted because of invasive species competition and over-fishing. From 1980-2005, fish production skyrocketed from 53 to 8,500 tons, according to the United Nations. Humans are also inadvertently degrading coral reefs through eco-tourism.
Some areas in the country’s southwest coast have lost up to 99 percent of coral cover, according to a study by marine conservation group Blue Ventures.
Climate change also threatens wildlife, according to a 2008 study by Rice University ecologist Amy Dunham. She predicted the endangered Milne-Edwards’ sifaka — a lemur found in southeastern Madagascar — would lose half its population within three generations. Changing weather patterns could also threaten animals. Dunham found lemurs are more than 65 percent less fertile in El Niño years.
Running On Empty 
Madagascar is home to more than 18 million people, according to Conservation International. That number grows annually by 3 percent and is expected to double by 2025. Ratsimbazafy said increased competition for land and resources will push wildlife further toward extinction.
“If the same speed of current deforestation still continues within the next 25 years, there [will be] no forest left in Madagscar,” Ratsimbazafy said. “No forest, no biodiversity. It’s very scary.”
The United Nations Environmental, Scientific and Cultural Organization has listed six rainforest parks in Madagascar as World Heritage sites, making them eligible for conservation funding. Other non- governmental organizations, like Durrell and the Andosibe-based Mitsinjo, try to balance conservation with improving locals’ quality of life through agricultural training, education initiatives — including building schools — and eco-tourism jobs.
The Malagasy need all the help they can get. More than 68 percent live in poverty, and 85 percent of those live in rural areas, according to 2005 figures from the National Institute of Statistics. Malagasy life expectancy is about 55 years. Poor hygiene, chronic malnutrition and lack of drinking water contributes to 84 of every 1,000 children dying before age 5, according to the United Nations Development Programme.
Outside Andasibe park, children walk barefoot to school past shacks — made of little more than sticks and raffia palm leaves next to pigpens and open sewers. Many children work in muddy rice paddys.
“Conservation is always difficult when people get little access to food, little access to healthcare or little access to education,” Ratsimbazafy said. “This is not only a concern for Madagascar, but a world concern for all scientists, for all conservationists.”
Anisa Abid is a second-year graduate student in MSU’s environmental journalism program. This is her second appearance in EJ. Contact her at abidanis@msu.edu.

samedi 31 janvier 2009

American Progress

In John Gast's 'American Progress,' (1872) a diaphanously and precarious clad America floats westward thru the air with the 'star of empire' on her forehead. She has left the cities of the east behind, and the wide Mississippi, and still her course is westward. In her right hand she carries a school book-- testimonial of the national enlightenment, while with her left she trails the slender wires of the telegraph that will bind the nation. Fleeing her approach are Indians, buffalo, wild horses, bears, and other game, disappearing into the storm and waves of the Pacific coast. they flee the wonderous vision--the star 'is too much for them.'--Precis of a contemporary description of this painting by George Crofutt who distributred his engraving of it widely. http://www.csub.edu/~gsantos/img0061.html