mercredi 26 octobre 2011

Shark strikes prompt lethal hunt, even as some call for conservation - The Washington Post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/shark-strikes-prompt-lethal-hunt-even-as-some-call-for-conservation/2011/10/24/gIQAjES7GM_story.html?hpid=z2




Shark strikes prompt lethal hunt, even as some call for conservation - The Washington Post

111023_123949_78_KeysDeepReef_1319581080-2011-10-26-18-04.jpg



Sharks have killed four people off Australia in the past 14 months, including three since early September. So when 32-year-old American George Thomas Wainwright was killed Saturday while diving, West Australian authorities issued an order to capture and kill the great white shark involved in the incident. They set six baited lines in waters off Rottnest Island, where Wainwright died, and shifted locations once in hot pursuit. But by Monday, they decided the shark had migrated far offshore, and they abandoned the effort.


The decision by Australian officials to exercise this authority for the first time — despite the target being an otherwise protected species — highlights the contradictory relationship humans now have with sharks. Some people would like to protect them in theory, but it’s harder to do it in practice.


The number of shark-related deaths this year — 13 worldwide — is nearly triple the annual average, prompting some coastal communities to take drastic action. But shark conservation measures are gathering momentum in the United States and abroad, as policymakers and scientists warn that the sea’s most feared predator is in danger of disappearing.


“It’s the ‘Jaws’ effect. There’s something primal about this fear of shark attacks that you don’t have with other animals,” said Maryland Del. Eric G. Luedtke (D-Montgomery), who is drafting a measure that would ban the sale, trade and possession of shark fins in Maryland. Luedtke thinks his bill stands a strong chance of passage next year, and he has watched the Australian hunt with dismay.


“It’s sad to see that, because it’s not going to make you any safer,” he said.


George Burgess, curator of the International Shark Attack File at the Florida Museum of Natural History, said no single factor explains what he called the “big jump” in the number of deaths this year. (The total number of incidents, including non-fatal encounters, 64, is in keeping with previous years.) Warmer waters in places such as the Sea of Japan, also known as the East Sea, could be connected to the unusual shark strikes off Russia, Burgess said, while human activities such as fish farming may have lured sharks to Reunion Island, east of Madagascar, where two deaths occurred.


This weekend’s shark hunt was the fifth this year, according to University of Sydney doctoral researcher Christopher Neff, marking what may be an all-time high. The other ones took place in the Seychelles, Reunion Island, Mexico and Russia. In almost every instance, communities sought to kill sharks after multiple attacks. The searches have had different stated aims: Reunion Island authorities said they were gathering scientific data by killing sharks, while Seychelles officials said they were paying fishermen for dead sharks in hopes of recovering the wedding ring of the British honeymooner who died off their shores. But in each case, officials emphasized they were seeking to protect the public.


Page 2 of 2


In a statement, West Australian Fisheries Minister Norman Moore told The Washington Post that the multiple attacks were “an unprecedented circumstance which required an unprecedented response,” noting that his task was complicated because many people approach the waters of Rottnest Island from boats and might not see beach signs or patrols. He added, “There is no order to cull sharks — there is an exemption under the [law] that has always been there to take an endangered species if or when it poses an imminent threat to human life.”


Several experts, including Burgess, questioned whether targeting an individual shark would enhance human safety. More than 100 marine biologists wrote to Moore, as well as other state and local authorities, urging them to “realize that a shark cull would be disastrous not only to our marine environment but also Australia’s reputation as a world leader in marine conservation.”


A 1994 scientific study of shark-control efforts that Hawaii undertook between 1959 and 1976 found the measures killed “4,668 sharks at an average cost of $182 per shark.” But the authors concluded that they did little to affect tiger sharks, which were most likely to attack humans.


“Shark hunts are an example of a political effort to reduce the public perception of risk rather than real risk reduction,” Neff wrote in an e-mail. He added that governments would be better off investing in warning flags, message boards and announcements that “allow beach goers to see the ocean in a more complete way.”


Chuck Anderson, who lost his right arm to a bull shark in 2000 off Gulf Shores, Ala., urged his friends not to hunt down the shark he encountered. “What right do we have — even having my right arm ripped off — to start advocating to kill sharks, just to make us feel safer?” he asked.


Environmentalists have won a series of new protections for sharks this year, arguing that the predators have been decimated by indiscriminate industrial fishing and fishing for their fins, which are used in shark’s fin soup, an Asian delicacy. Between 26 million and 73 million sharks a year are targeted for their fins, scientists say, and roughly a third of all shark species face some threat of extinction.


California Gov. Jerry Brown (D) signed a shark fin ban this month, joining Washington, Oregon and Hawaii. Groups such as the National Aquarium are pushing for Maryland to become the first state on the East Coast to enact such a ban. Toronto, Canada’s largest city, enacted a similar ban Tuesday.


Andy Dehart, the National Aquarium’s director of fishes, said the group is pushing for legislation because after tagging sharks in Delaware Bay and maintaining them in captivity for 30 years, he and others are convinced that “they’re not well-suited for the pressure of a fishery that the shark fin trade is doing to them.”


In Florida, the state’s Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission is poised to vote Nov. 16 to ban the harvest of tiger sharks and scalloped, smooth and great hammerhead sharks in state waters. Academics, such as University of Miami Rosenstiel School professor Neil Hammerschlag, who studies sharks off the Keys, have pushed for the measure.


But to people like George Wainwright, who lives in Panama City, Fla., protecting sharks seems like an anathema in the wake of his son’s recent death. “I can only say I wish I was there,” he said in a phone interview. “There has to be somewhere where you see people as more important than this shark.”

dimanche 23 octobre 2011

Shark Attacks In 2010 Rose By 25%

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/09/shark-attack-numbers-on-t_n_820406.html



Shark Attacks In 2010 Rose By 25%
r-SHARK-ATTACKS-2010-large570-2011-10-23-03-30.jpg
The Huffington Post  Joanna Zelman  First Posted: 02/ 9/11 09:03 AM ET Updated: 04/11/11 05:12 AM ET


  Animals , 2010 Shark Attacks , How Many Shark Attacks In 2010 , Shark Attack File , Shark Attack Numbers , Shark Attack Statistics , Shark Attacks , Shark Attacks 2010 , Green News




It seems the sharks have decided to even out the shoreline playing field a bit. According to MSNBC, as shark attack numbers declined in the "shark capital of the world," shark attacks increased globally.
The University of Florida's International Shark Attack File released their annual report on Monday, and found that 79 attacks were reported in 2010, up 25% from the previous year.
While Florida saw its fourth straight decline with 13 attacks, the U.S. still led in numbers with 36 total attacks this year. They were followed by Australia (14) and South Africa (8).
But the oddest occurrence, which file director George Burgess deemed "the most unusual shark incident of my career," was when five shark attacks occurred in the Red Sea off Egypt's coast in December. These bizarre attacks may have occurred due to a combination of high water temperatures, dead sheep in the water, and divers feeding the animals.
So who is attacked by sharks? It's not normally the skinny dipping crowd, unlike what Jaws may have audiences believe. In reality, over half of all shark attacks globally involved surfers.
An average of five people per year are killed by sharks. Meanwhile, fishing fleets kill up to 70 million sharks per year. Given these statistics, Burgess suggests, "The sea is actually very forgiving, certainly from the standpoint of the animal life."
Less than a month ago, environmental groups accused 20 countries of failing to protect sharks from the threat of extinction. Sharks are late to mature and produce few young, making it difficult to replenish their population. 30% of all shark species are threatened or nearly threatened with extinction. When sharks are overfished, not only is the species affected, but major ecosystems are disrupted. While it seems unlikely that humans can negotiate a peace treaty with the sharks, people can at least take steps to preserve marine life's delicate balance.

jeudi 20 octobre 2011

An Economist for Nature Calculates the Need for More Protection

2fc25e2c5db9a56816596c006a6b63f3-2011-10-20-08-08.jpg


An Economist for Nature Calculates the Need for More Protection


By JOHN MOIR
Published: August 8, 2011
  • COTO BRUS, Costa Rica — Dawn is breaking over this remote upland region, where neat rows of coffee plants cover many of the hillsides. The rising tropical sun saturates the landscape with color, revealing island like remnants of native forest scattered among the coffee plantations.
Enlarge This Image
c7880278204bec29739f93052468afae-2011-10-20-08-08.jpeg

Charles J. Katz, Jr.


A GLOBAL FOCUS Gretchen Daily, a Stanford biology professor, in Palo Alto, Calif.
RSS Feed
fc5341b1698a2b55cb249a001f6bd4b5-2011-10-20-08-08.jpg
Get Science News From The New York Times »
But across this bucolic countryside, trouble is brewing. An invasive African insect known as the coffee berry borer is threatening the area’s crops. Local farmers call the pest “la broca”: the borer.
Despite the early hour, Gretchen Daily, a Stanford University biology professor, is already at work studying this complex ecosystem. Amid a cacophony of birdsong, Dr. Daily and her team are conducting experiments that demonstrate the vital connection between wildlife and native vegetation. Preliminary data from new studies suggest that consumption of insects like la broca by forest-dwelling birds and bats contribute significantly to coffee yields.
Since 1991, Dr. Daily, 46, has made frequent trips to this Costa Rican site to conduct one of the tropics’ most comprehensive population-level studies to monitor long-term ecological change.
“We are working to very specifically quantify in biophysical and dollar terms the value of conserving the forest and its wildlife,” she said.
In recent years, Dr. Daily has expanded her research to include a global focus. She is one of the pioneers in the growing worldwide effort to protect the environment by quantifying the value of “natural capital” — nature’s goods and services that are fundamental for human life — and factoring these benefits into the calculations of businesses and governments. Dr. Daily’s work has attracted international attention and has earned her some of the world’s most coveted environmental awards.
Part of Dr. Daily’s interest in natural capital emerged from her research in Costa Rica, where she became intrigued with an innovative government initiative known as Payment for Environmental Services. The program, initiated in the 1990s, pays landowners to maintain native forest rather than cut it and has contributed to a significant reduction in Costa Rica’s deforestation rate.
The Costa Rican program helped inspire Dr. Daily to co-found the Natural Capital Project in 2006. NatCap, as the program is known, is a venture led by Stanford University, the University of Minnesota and two of the world’s largest conservation organizations, the Nature Conservancy and the World Wildlife Fund. It aims to transform traditional conservation methods by including the value of “ecosystem services” in business, community and government decisions. These benefits from nature — like flood protection, crop pollination and carbon storage — are not part of the traditional economic equation.
“Currently, there is no price for most of the ecosystem services we care about, like clean air and clean water,” said Stephen Polasky, professor of ecological/environmental economics at the University of Minnesota. He says that because economic calculations often ignore nature, the results can lead to the destruction of the very ecosystems upon which the economy is based.
“Our economic system values land for two primary reasons,” said Adam Davis, a partner in Ecosystem Investment Partners, a company that manages high-priority conservation properties. “One is building on the land, and the second is taking things from the land.”
“Right now, the way a forest is worth money is by cutting it down,” Mr. Davis said. “We measure that value in board-feet of lumber or tons of pulp sold to a paper mill.” What has been missing, he says, is a countervailing economic force that measures the value of leaving a forest or other ecosystem intact.
Early on, Dr. Daily recognized that new tools were needed to quantify nature’s value. “We began by developing a software program called InVEST (Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs) to map and value nature’s goods and services that are essential for humans,” she said.
The software, which is available as a free download, enables the comparison of various environmental scenarios. What is the real cost of draining a wetland or clearing a coastline of mangroves? InVEST models the trade-offs and helps decision makers better understand the implications of their choices.
“Our dream was not to try to capture the full value of nature’s services, because that’s so hard to do,” Dr. Daily said. “Our goal is to begin making inroads in the decision-making process by including at least some of the value of nature in the economic equation.”
The Natural Capital Project now works in Latin America, Africa, Asia, the Pacific and North America. In China, NatCap is working with the government on an ambitious program to protect natural capital. After deforestation caused extensive flooding in 1998, China committed $100 billion to convert vast areas of cropland back into forest and grassland. The government is building on this success by helping to develop and test the InVEST software to put in place a new reserve network that is projected to span 25 percent of the country. The reserves will help with flood control, irrigation, drinking supply, hydropower production, biodiversity and climate stabilization.
At a NatCap site in Hawaii, Kamehameha Schools, the state’s largest private landowner, used InVEST to evaluate future land use for a 26,000-acre site on the North Shore of Oahu. In the past, the landholding had been used for aquaculture, crops and habitation. After examining the alternatives modeled by InVEST, Kamehameha Schools selected a diversified mix of forestry and agriculture intended to improve water quality, sequester carbon and generate income.
About seven months ago, Google.org, the philanthropic arm of Google.com, unveiled a powerful new tool that enables global-scale monitoring and measurement of changes in the earth’s environment. Called Google Earth Engine, it features a huge trove of satellite imagery of the earth’s surface. NatCap is now moving the InVEST software onto the Google Earth Engine platform.
“Right now, when we do a NatCap project or use InVEST, we send people to a country or state, and they spend weeks accumulating the data and putting it in the right format,” said Peter Kareiva, vice president and chief scientist for the Nature Conservancy. Google Earth Engine will greatly speed the analysis process, Dr. Kareiva said.
Luis Solórzano, program director of environmental science at the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, who worked on Google Earth Engine, says that the new tool can map trends and allow scientists to forecast such things as soil fertility, erosion and deforestation. “It’s the kind of tool policy makers need to make informed decisions,” Dr. Solórzano said.
Because the natural capital concept is anthropocentric, Dr. Daily sometimes is asked whether quantifying ecosystem services runs the risk of ignoring nature’s intrinsic worth or overlooking difficult-to-measure aspects of the natural world, like aesthetic or spiritual benefits.
Dr. Daily acknowledges that certain properties of nature defy quantification. “The beauty of the natural capital approach is it leaves the vast, immeasurable aspects of nature in their own realm while focusing in a very practical way on environmental benefits that we can and should incorporate into our current decisions.”
The precarious state of the world’s environment has concerned Dr. Daily since her teenage years, when her family lived in West Germany and she witnessed the destructive power of acid rain on the country’s forests. “I realized then that I wanted to be a scientist,” she said. This early fascination with nature led to her passion for the forests of Costa Rica, and that in turn set the course for her international leadership with natural capital.
Dr. Daily’s work took on a special urgency with the 2005 publication of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, which was developed under the auspices of the United Nations. This report found that recent and rapid human-caused changes have produced a “substantial and largely irreversible loss” in the diversity of life on earth and that two-thirds of the world’s ecosystem services were declining.
“The loss of earth’s biodiversity is permanent,” Dr. Daily said. “And it is happening on our watch. We need to convey with compelling evidence the value of nature and the cost of losing it. I find it stunning that until the next asteroid hits the planet, it is humanity that is collectively deciding the future course of all known life.”


A version of this article appeared in print on August 9, 2011, on page D3 of the New York edition with the headline: An Economist for Nature Calculates the Need for More Protection.

samedi 1 octobre 2011

http://www.negawatt.org/telechargement/Presse//negaWattLeMonde30092011.pdf

En 2050, une France sans émissions
deCO2 ninucléaire?
Selon les experts de l’association NégaWatt, un scénario énergétique vertueux est possible
Sortir du nucléaire et réduire drastiquement les émissions de gaz à effet de serre tout en
conservant un mode de vie moder- ne, c’est possible, selon NégaWatt. Cette association d’ingénieurs et d’experts des questions de l’éner- gie a publié, jeudi 29 septembre, son scénario de la situation énergé- tique française en 2050.
Elle avait déjà publié, en 2003 et 2006, deux scénarios fondés sur la recherche d’une solution énergéti- que passant par la réduction des émissions de gaz à effet de serre et l’abandon du nucléaire. Le scéna- rio présenté aujourd’hui, mis en chantier il y a plus d’un an, intègre une méthodologie beaucoup plus développée et de nouvelles préoc- cupations sociales.
« Habituellement, explique Thierry Salomon, président de NégaWatt, le monde de l’énergie part des ressources. Il faut inverser le raisonnement, en analysant d’abord les usages et les besoins. »
Les experts ont donc bâti leur modèle à partir des principaux besoins en énergie (chauffage, mobilité, éclairage et appareils élec- triques) qu’ils ont transposés par secteur d’activité (habitat, tertiai- re, transports, industrie et agricul- ture), cherchant dans chaque cas la meilleure solution énergétique.
La France consomme aujour- d’hui près de 3 000 térawatt-heu- re (TWh) d’énergie, dont près d’un tiers se dissipe sous forme d’eau chaude dans l’atmosphère ou dans les rivières, par les centrales thermiques. NégaWatt prévoit une diminution à moins de
1 000 TWh en 2050. La clé de cette performance réside dans une poli- tique plaçant l’accent sur la sobrié- té et l’efficacité énergétique.
Le principal gisement se situe dans le bâtiment, où une politique durable de rénovation thermique (au rythme de 750 000 logements traités par an) permettrait de rédui- re la consommation de 600 TWh.
« Réparabilité »
Le transport est aussi riche d’un fort potentiel d’économies, tant par des progrès techniques (consom- mation des véhicules ramenée à 2,5 l/100 km) que par la limitation de l’étalement urbain et la stimula- tion des transports « doux » (vélo, véhicules au gaz naturel) et collec- tifs. L’industrie peut aussi progres- ser, notamment en développant le recyclage des matériaux et la « répa- rabilité » des objets.
Le scénario envisage une ferme- ture progressive des réacteurs nucléaires qui s’achèverait en 2033, les énergies renouvelables – au premier rang desquelles le bois – prenant la relève.
L’exercice repose autant sur les évolutions techniques que sociéta- les. Il s’appuie aussi sur l’agricultu- re, notamment en promouvant la réduction de la consommation de viande, qui libérerait des terres pour la production de biogaz.
NégaWatt veut alimenter le débat politique de 2012. Il présente- ra, début octobre, son scénario au Parti socialiste et à Europe Ecolo- gie-Les Verts. Ainsi qu’à l’UMP et à d’autres, s’ils le désirent. p
Hervé Kempf

page1image15980-2011-10-1-10-09.png
page1image16120-2011-10-1-10-09.png
page1image16260-2011-10-1-10-09.png
page1image16400-2011-10-1-10-09.png
page1image16540-2011-10-1-10-09.png




















2 500

2 000

1 500

1 000

500

0
Le scénario énergétique de NégaWatt
D’ici à 2050, économies d’énergie et sources renouvelables compensent la chute du nucléaire et des fossiles
ÉVOLUTION DES SOURCES D’ÉNERGIE PRIMAIRE, en térawatts-heure
Energies renouvelables Pétrole Charbon
3 000
2 965
Uranium Gaz naturel
Sobriété
Efficacité (consommation)
Efficacité (production)
1 028 TWh
page1image22392-2011-10-1-10-09.png page1image23492-2011-10-1-10-09.png


page1image23852-2011-10-1-10-09.png page1image24072-2011-10-1-10-09.png page1image24292-2011-10-1-10-09.png page1image24512-2011-10-1-10-09.png
page1image24788-2011-10-1-10-09.png
page1image24928-2011-10-1-10-09.png
page1image25068-2011-10-1-10-09.png
page1image25208-2011-10-1-10-09.png
page1image25348-2011-10-1-10-09.png

2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
SOURCE : NÉGAWATT

Sea Shepherd: “Les surfais réunionnais, une honte pour la communauté mondiale du surf”

http://www.zinfos974.com/Sea-Shepherd-Les-surfers-reunionnais-une-honte-pour-la-communaute-mondiale-du-surf_a32635.html

Sea Shepherd: “Les surfais réunionnais, une honte pour la communauté mondiale du surf”

Dans le même thème…
  1. Requin : Baignade toujours interdite à Boucan Canot, les prélèvement stoppés
  2. Photos et vidéo du requin bouledogue de 2,44m et 156kg pêché à Boucan
  3. Prélèvements de requins: Lettre ouverte du “Collectif pour la Protection de l’océan indien”
  4. Chasse au requin, toujours pas de prise pour les pêcheurs
  5. Prélèvements de requins : Brigitte Bardot écrit au préfet !
3314792-4754682-2011-10-1-09-43.jpg

Sea Shepherd Conservation Society (SSCS) est une ONG (organisation non-gouvernementale) américaine créée en 1977 qui a pour objectif la conservation de la faune et de la flore marines.


“Notre mission est de mettre un terme à la destruction des écosystèmes marins et au massacre des espèces dans le but de conserver et de protéger la biodiversité des océans du monde entier. Nous mettons en place des stratégies novatrices d’action directe pour enquêter, documenter et intervenir si nécessaire afin d’exposer et de combattre les activités illégales de haute mer. En sauvegardant la biodiversité, nous nous efforçons de préserver la survie de nos fragiles écosystèmes marins pour les futures générations”, explique l’ONG sur son site Internet.


Elle possède plusieurs bateaux sur les différents océans du monde et intervient, parfois de façon violente, grâce à un mandat dévolu par la Charte Mondiale pour la Nature des Nations Unies.


SSCS possède depuis 2006 une antenne en France, présidée par Lamya Essemlali. Hier, cette dernière a publié un article sur le site Internet français de l’ONG intitulé : “Les surfais réunionnais, une honte pour la communauté mondiale du surf”. Retrouvez-le ci-dessous en intégralité :


“En tant que femme Française, je suis profondément choquée de l’attitude de certains de mes concitoyens Réunionnais.


En effet, on dirait bien qu’une partie des surfais de la Réunion ne soient rien d’autre qu’une bande de froussards vindicatifs.


Le 19 septembre dernier, un requin a attaqué et tué le body surfer Mathieu Schiller âgé de 32 ans. Cet accident est une tragédie que nous regrettons tous mais il ne s’agissait aucunement d’un acte de malice.


C’est le genre de chose qui peut arriver. Pour un requin, vu de dessous la surface, un homme sur une planche ressemble à s’y méprendre à la silhouette d’un phoque.


Les phoques et les requins font partie de ce milieu naturel et les phoques sont la proie naturelle des requins. Les surfais en revanche, ne font pas partie de l’éco-système marin.


Les requins restent confinés à leur milieu naturel et ils n’investissent jamais le nôtre. Le nombre moyen de personnes tuées chaque année par les requins dans le monde est de cinq. A titre de comparaison, les autruches tuent en moyenne une centaine de personnes, ce qui veut dire que les autruches sont vingt fois plus dangereuses que les requins. Et pourtant on ne voit pas beaucoup de gens crier au scandale et exiger la “chasse préventive” des autruches…


En fait n’importe quel joueur de golf s’avère être plus courageux et viril que le surfer Réunionais moyen. Plus de golfeurs sont tués chaque année, frappés par la foudre sur un terrain de golf qu’il n’y a de surfais qui meurent des suites d’une attaque de requin.


Sea Shepherd Conservation Society est soutenue par de nombreux surfais dans le monde. Kelly Slater et Dave Rastovich, deux des meilleurs surfais mondiaux font partie du Bureau des Conseillers de Sea Shepherd. Nous avons trois femmes plongeuses qui nagent régulièrement avec des grands blancs et des requins tigres et nos équipages surfent et nagent avec des requins à longueur de temps.


Mais sans doute est ce parce que nous ne sommes pas faits du même bois que ce groupe de surfais pleurnichards de la Réunion qui sont tellement déconnectés de la réalité qu’ils se sont lancés dans cette chasse aux sorcière décérébrée, en quête de vengeance, suite à l’attaque récente d’un surfer.

⠊⠠L’hystérie ambiante a déjà commencé à s’exprimer avec le lâche abattage d’une dizaine de requins à la Réunion et ça n’est apparemment qu’un début.


Comparez donc cette réaction à celle de la jeune adolescente Hannah Mighmal, âgée alors de quinze ans, mordue par un requin en Tasmanie, il y a deux ans. La première chose qu’elle fit fut de déclarer publiquement qu’elle ne voulait pas que l’on tue de requins en représailles, car ils ne sont pas fautifs. Nous lui avons remis une médaille et Kelly Slater l’a personnellement félicitée pour avoir compris que les surfais se doivent de respecter la Nature et non la mépriser.


Ou encore le cas de ce membre de Sea Shepherd, mort récemment à la suite d’une attaque de requin. Il avait dit à ses parents que si un requin s’en prenait un jour à lui, il ne voulait pas qu’on cherche à le venger et qu’au contraire, il souhaitait que tous les soutiens qu’ils pourraient recevoir soient reversés à Sea Shepherd pour nos campagnes de protection des requins.


Chaque année, les humains exterminent 90 millions de requins, une grande partie d’entre eux voient leurs ailerons arrachés avant d’être rejetés à la mer, promis à une mort lente et douloureuse.


Les requins sont une espèce essentielle à la santé de nos océans et seuls des ignorants peuvent souhaiter les voir disparaître. Si nous éliminons les requins, nous détruisons l’intégrité écologique des océans et si les océans meurent, nous mourrons avec eux. Ce qui veut dire aussi, plus de surfer boys.


En tant que femme Française, je reste perplexe devant ces pseudos surfais français qui réclament hystériquement le lynchage des requins dans les eaux réunionnaises quand une vraie surfeuse comme la jeune Hannah Mighmal, âgée de quinze ans a le courage et la sagesse d’accepter le responsabilité qui est la sienne, lorsqu’elle prend le risque conscient et volontaire de surfer dans l’habitat naturel des requins littéralement déguisée en la proie naturelle des requins.


Qu’il est insultant à la mémoire de Mathieu Shiller que le massacre de ces magnifiques créatures soit mené en son nom.


Mathieu Shiller était un grand surfer et en tant que tel, je présume qu’il respectait la mer et les magnifiques créatures qui la peuplent - requins compris. Comment vous, surfais de la Réunion pouvez vous croire faire honneur à la mémoire de ce grand homme, de ce talentueux surfer en menant cette campagne indigne de vengeance à l’encontre d’une créature cruciale et magnifique qui n’a rien fait d’autre que de se comporter de manière naturelle.


Après tout, les requins ne nous pourchassent pas sans pitié par millions pour concocter un bol de soupe. Ils ne sont ni destructeurs, ni vindicatifs comme nous le sommes avec à peu près tout ce qui vit dans les océans.


Faites donc ce qui est juste pour Mathieu Shiller. Honorez sa vie au lieu de déshonorer son nom avec votre insensée chasse aux sorcière à l’encontre de créatures qui ne méritent pas un tel sort.


Par Lamya Essemlali, Présidente de Sea Shepherd France”


Vendredi 30 Septembre 2011 - 10:23